Direct reading system for metal ion determination



. 4, 1956 E. B. oFFuTT ETAL DIRECT READING SYSTEM FOR METAL ION DETERMINATION' 3 Sh'ge'tS-Sheefc -1 Filed Nov. 28, v1952 Fig. 1

INVENToRs E/mer Brad/ey Offuh By Leonard V. Sorg muy 'Arron/vir Dec. 4, 1956 E. B. oFFUTT ETAL DIRECT READING SYSTEM FOR METAL ION DETERMINATION Filed Nov. 28, 1952 3 Sheets-Sheet 2 INVENT0RS-l 'E7/77er Brad/ey Uffa# Leonard lf. Sarg Fig. 2

ATTORNEY Dec.`4, 1956 E. B. oFFuTT ETAL 2,773,021

DIRECT READING SYSTEM FOR METAL ION DETERMINATION Filed NOV. 28, 1952.

3 Sheets-Sheet 5 A VINVENTORS:

'lmer Brad/ey 'Offuf F' 3 By Leonard V Sorg ATTORNEY United States Patent() INGSYSTEM'FOR'METL IONV DETERMINATION Y l'nerlBradlyOliitt, Independence, and Leonard V. Sorg;

City, Mb., assi'gnors to Standard'il Company, Chicago",l lll., a corporation of Indiana Application .November 28, 1952. Serial No'. 323,1041

1 Claim. (0.204-1) permitsthe flow of current and at a1 deiinite voltage a characteristicV electrode reaction occurs forthe particular metal` inthe solution. The voltage at which this` reactions occursgis an identifying voltage. If a voltage less than the identifying voltage is applied betweenelectrodes` immersed int a solution of that substance, only a small residual` current'flows. 0n the other hand, if a volt-v age somewhatA greaterthan the identifying voltage is applied, the magnitude of the increase in electrolyzing currentis proportionalto the concentration ofthe metal inthe test solution; It'follows, therefore,V that when. an increasing voltage is-appliedbetween electrodes immersed in avsolgutionfof several metal ions no appreciable/current*` will.` pass until thelowest critical.` potential is reached. Wheny avoltage somewhat above this value-isl attained; a` currenty increase occursl proportional to` thei concentration of the iirst and corresponding' substance; when the:A nextV higher identifying potential is reached an abrupt increasefin current indicates the presence of the second substance-and the current increase measured.v at axsomewhat higher voltageV is proportional to the conceutrationv of the-second' substance; The determination otsuch a current-voltage curve thus amounts to qualitative and quantitative analysis of the test solution.` This' general type of1system, although very usefull for. analytical purposes is not readily adaptable to rapid. and frequent determinations as required for control purposes.

Polargraphic analytical procedures have been proposed heretofore for the determination of lead in: gasoline. Howevenin'all such prior systems a polarogram of` the solution is prepared byeither'manualor automatic plot:-V

ting. of` the relationship between the voltage and'diifusion current thatresults from the presence of the lead ionin the, test solution into which a dropping mercuryf elec-- trodeUV has. been placed. The subsequent measurement ofthe lead ion diiusion current wasV converted to an` equivalent value of tetraethyllead by reference to a previ'ousl'y prepared standard calibration curve or chart.

VSuclia polarograpliic technique requires relatively coms ICC paratusE and. method for the analysis of-V sol-utions whiclr: utilizes in part. theA general principles ofwpolarographic: analysisbut which does notfhave thedisadvantages.-wliiclif are inherent in the plotting and use of ,alpolarogramtx` Another object of ourinvention is' to provide.A arr-instrument for the rapid determiuation'andvisualv indications of the current-voltage relationshipsl in: the electrolytic:` systemsfunder test.'v v It isza further object ofV our inventiontotsprovideY ai system. which is notsusceptible-r to changeY inzdropping.; rate of mercury from thel electrode;` or dilution, acidity; or temperaturechanges ofthe test solution withirrnormallyA encountered ranges.' Anotherfobject is tol pro videi at system employing afpilot' ionil which` permitsl read ing concentrations of the unknownA metal directly# andi" free from iniluence-` ofA dropping rate; dilution, acidity and` temperature changes. A further object isto', pro@ vide a system which avoids errors encountered in plot# tingandireadingtconventionali polarograms and in making' arithmetical calculations. A- morefspecic objectis to provide af` method and. means for thel determination@ ofvconcentration of tetraethylleadf in gasoline without calculations and plotting ofgraphs or charts. Thesefland other objects will becomev apparent as the` description proceeds.

To attain these; and other'objects, our invention pro; vides a unique direct reading polarographic instrumentl and' method for the determination of tetraethyllead in gasoline without calculations or reference to graphs`y or" charts. Tetraethylleadis decomposed by the hydro'- chloric':V acid treatment`V ofy a leaded' gasoline `and' the re-jv sultant lead chloride ina test solution is analyzed" by" means of current measurements in` a polarographit:l cell containing a' dropping' mercury -electrode; The result" is' obtained by the use of a plurality off'voltagadivider circuits; adapted to impressa series ofsuccessively decreased voltages' across the test solution in' the cell corrtaiinngthe` dropping mercury electrode and an associated currentmeasuring network adaptedto indicate visually a .rela` tionship betweenthe resulting 'currents passingthrougl the" test solution in such a way that the tetraethyllead"A concentration is revealed directly from a dial scale associatedwith the current-measuring network.

The dropping mercury electrode comprises a glass, tube having a very tine-capillary through which mercury passesu downwardly under pressure of'a head of. mercury. in a reservoir above the capillary. The diameter and.V length of the capillary tube are such that themercury is discharged from the open endv at a slow rate. The delivery end of they tube is irnmersed'in the solution undergoinganalysis and the drops of mercury whichform. at the end of the capillary comprise the cathode. of a cell; a Vpool of mercury collected below the capillary comprises the anode of the test cell. Voltages are. ap.V plied to the cell from a battery or other suitable source of` potential through a plurality of Voltagev dividing circuits. The currents flowing through the cell are balanced out in electrical bridge networks, the. last such network being actuated by a direct readngdial calibrated'. in milliliters of tetraethyllead in gasoline. To compensate for temperature eiectsupon the gasoline sample., and to enable the direct reading'of the tetraethyllead concentration without calculations of any kind, the gasoline sample for analysis is measured with a` special' pipette which delivers aV volume of sampleequivalenti to a specified standard volume measured at 60d" F. y l

In view of the specific nature of the lead'solution, weI

known quantityl of" a metal ionh'aving a'haljfrwavepof tential' above thatv ofl lead, e'. g. cadmium,l which serves as a pilot ion. Although the cadmium ion is preferred, we may use other metal ions as pilot ions if the half wave potential of the metal is at least 0.2 volt above lead. For example, we may use soluble compounds of zinc, nickel, chromium, and the like. The added metal ion serves as a reference or pilot ion land by our invention the lead content of the acid extract from the gasoline is determined with reference to this pilot ion.

The analytical results are obtained after applying a series of successively increased voltages across the test cell and are read directly from a dial scale calibrated for the range of to 5 ml. tetraethyllead per gallon of gasoline. Our improved system will be described hereinafter with reference to a speciiic embodiment of apparatus and a particular pilot ion.

In the drawings the invention includes the arrangement of apparatus described in connection therewith where corresponding elements are identified by similar reference characters and wherein:

Figure 1 is a schematic wiring diagram of one form of our apparatus illustrating the electrical principles employed;

Figure 2 is a diagrammatic representation of the current-voltage relationships which exist and make feasible the apparatus illustrated in Figures l and 3 when employing a pilot ion; and

Figure 3 is a more detailed schematic representation of a preferred form of our apparatus.

Referring to the wiring diagram shown in Figure 1, C is a measuring cell assembly connected in a circuit including a potential divider network composed of electrical potentiometers R16, R17, and R1s. The current through this network from battery B Vis controlled by rheostat R1. The voltage supplied by each of the potentiometers Ris, R17, and R18 is adjusted by taking taps at potentials of between about 0.30 and about 0.37 volt on potentiometer R10, between about 0.57 and about 0.60 volt on potentiometer R17, and between 0.82 and 0,9 volt on potentiometer R18.

Switches S11-S12, S21-S22, S31-S32 and $41-$42 are push-button type switches jointly assembled in a latching, inter-releasing mechanism so each may be individually operated, releasing any other switch which may have been previously depressed. By means of these switches the selected potentials may in turn be applied across the electrodes forming a part of the measuring cell assembly C. As a selected potential is applied to the measuring cell C containing the solution of metal ions prepared as described herein, an electrical current flows Vthrough the cell which causes a proportional potential drop across resistor R10 which is in series with the cell C. This potential drop across R10 is measured by the network composed of potentiometer Ra and potentiometer R5, and the associated sub-network including potentiometer R0 and resistor R9. The control of potentiometer R8 is used to actuate a calibrated instrument dial with a scale 20.

For standardization of voltages S11-S12 (a push-button operated switch mounted in an assembly with S21-S22, S31- S32 and 841-842) is actuated by depressing its button, and the galvanometer G is connected in series with a standard voltage reference which may be a standard cell SC, and these two components of the circuit are connected across the R1s-R17R18 network. The galvanometer circuits may include other resistors selected to govern the galvanometer sensitivity in the various functions. With S11- S12 depressed adjusting the rheostat R1 to obtain a null reading on the galvanometer G causes standard potential drops across the potentiometer network VR1'0-R1'1-R1s.

Closing switches S21-S22 applies a rst potential to the measuring Vcell C and at the same time switch S11- S12 is set automatically to connect the galvanometer G'between the positive end of R10 and the slider of R5 so that a portion of potentiometer R may be selected to provide a potential at the slider of R5 equal to the laverage potential drop across resistor R10 due to the residual current plus the diffusion currents of both lead and cadmium. This balance is accomplished by adjusting R5 so that the galvanometer G swings equally to each side of zero, which is considered to be the null condition. The switch S31-S32 is then closed, releasing switch S21-S22 and applying a second potential to the measuring cell and simultaneously connecting the galvanometer G between the positive end of resistor R10 and the negative end of resistor R9. Adjusting the slider of R3 to obtain the null galvanometer condition results in the current through the Riz-R0 network being made proportional to the cell current due to cadmium ion alone.

Finally, a third potential is applied by closing push button switch $41-$42, releasing S31-832, and connecting the galvanometer G between the positive end of R10 and the slider of potentiometer Rs. The slider of Ra is adjusted to obtain the null galvanometer condition, the potential drop across the selected portion of Rs being equal to that portion of the potential drop across R10 due to the cell current from lead only. With S41-S42 closed the potential drop across R10 is due to the residual current only and the adjustment of the Ra slider actually serves to subtract the residual current from the lead current. This results in the tapped otr portion of R0 between its slider and the end next to Re being proportional to the lead current and consequently to the lead concentration. In selecting the portion of Rs equivalent to the lead ion concentration, the dial 20 is so positioned that the corresponding concentration of lead tetraethyl may be read from the dial scale. The scale 20 is uniform in its graduation and is marked in units of lead tetraethyl concentration.

In Figure 2, we have shown a set of curves illustrating the characteristic relationship between voltage applied to a test cell, containing a solution, a quiet mercury pool electrode, and a dropping mercury electrode, and the resulting diiusion current due to cadmium and due to three different concentrations of lead equivalent to l, 2 and 3 ml. of tetraethyllead per gallon of gasoline. The voltage values are those impressed across the dropping mercury electrode and the quiet mercury pool electrode with hydrochloric acid as a supporting electrolyte. According to our invention, diffusion currents are not actually measured but rather the magnitude of the current due to lead ions is compared with the current due to cadmium ions. The amount of cadmium added to any test solution is uniform and the resultant cadmium ions serve as pilot ions to which the lead may be referred as an indication of concentration. The current flowing during the applil cation of 0.83 volt is the residual current due to the supporting electrolyte plus the diifusion currents of lead and cadmium ions. The current obtained by applying 0.59 volt is due to lead ions and the residual current.

Only the residual current is obtained by impressing a voltage of 0.32 volt.

In our invention, by comparing the diffusion current due to the lead ions with that known to be due to cadmium, variations in the readings which result in ordinary apparatus from moderate differences in the mercury dropping rate, the cell temperature, the acidity of the test solution, and the extent of dilution of the solution are nullied as between Vsuccessive analyses. l In addition, and of greatV significance, comparison of the dilusion current due to lead with that known to be due to cadmium permits the application of electrical ratio measurements, thereby making possible the direct reading scale which is an important feature of our apparatus.

Referring to Figure 3 of-the drawing showing a preferred form of our apparatus, the measuring cell assembly C includes a dropping mercury electrode 30 consisting of a series of successively formed mercuryspheres or drops. An upper portion of the assembly comprises a amasar mercury reservoir 3-1 attached by` a rigidor ilexible` tube 3 Zto a mercuryrdropping capillary 33.

l In. the drawing the receiver 31 comprisesa leveling bulb, the. vertical position of which is adjustable to control the head of the capillary electrode 33 to adjustthe dropping rate from the. mercury electrode 30 at between 13 to 20 drops per minute. The tube 32 is flexible and may be fabricated, of plastic, rubber, woven metal, and the like. The upper en d of the tube 3 2 is fixed to the outlet of 'bulb 31 and the lower end engages a metallic electri-V cal connector 53 comprising a terminal of lead 51'. The interior bore of the connector is in electrical contact with the mercury flowing to= the capillary 33. A rubber sleeve 54 secures the connector 53 to the upper end; of the capill-ary 33.

The capillary 33 extends into the measuring cell chamber 34 which contains a, quiet mercury pool electrode 35 and the solution 36 to be analyzed. The mercury drop formation rate is controlled by the length and bore of the capillary 33 and theV head on the mercury in the reservoir 31. A mercury dropping rate of about l drops per minute has been found satisfactory. The capillary 33 -i.v adjusted within the Cell 3,4 so. that thetlower end` thereof is immersed within'the solut-ion` to; beanalyzed and is` aruzroxirn,ateiyA Onerquarter' inchr above.` the vsurface of theniercury pooles..

Preliminary to making a test, the cell: is purgedv with Qxlgtrlrfree nitrogenintroduced by conduit 37 andline 38.` for three to live minutes at a rate of about 200-250 ml., per minute to.I remove oxygen from the solution. In such apu-rging-operation, thestopcock 39 is adjusted to` direct` thetlow into thecelland theV purge gas is vented through"` tap 4,0, containing, a ballV check Valve, in the upper halfof` cell 41 connected to the lower half 34by spherical joint 42. Waste bottle 45 is provided foraccumulatingthe used,` mercury and spentsolution from the-test cell and a movable reservoir 4,6 connected by exible conduit 47 tostopcock 48 is used to adjust the level of the mercury.v poolV in the cell 34. The stopcock 48 permits. drainage of the cell 34. through line 49 into the waste bottle 45.

Electrical leads51 and 52; are connected to the measure ing1cell, electrodes 33` and 35. The aboye elements com-fl gallonrange.l The switches Sli-$1.2,.S21-S22, S31-S32..

and. Sdi-S42 are mounted in a` push-button. switch` assembly and` are individually operatedby alatchingf inter-releasing,pushfbutton mechanism. Depressing one of the buttons controlling theseA switches jlatches the button and. automatically releases any. other buttonthat may have been)l previously in the latched position. n

Right; lhandlportion ofpotentiorneter: R8

Resistor Rb The galvanometer G maybe, for example, ofthe type l The instrumentcircuit contains three voltage-divider networks, one consisting of seven-ohm wire-wound resi/stor Re, tenaohm wire-wound potentiometer controliRS, andi Q-ohm wire-wound resistor Re. i

' Another voltage-divider network; consists of at220eohm wire-wound resistor R7,the 2000,-ohm1scale potentiometer Re and 630-ohm wire-wound precision resistor R9. A third-.voltage-dividernetwork consists of'f three wirewound precision resistors, R having 320 ohms,'Rj1s having-270 ohms, R17 `having 240 ohms, and-R18 having 1 89 ohms. voltages across the networksdescribed above are standardized for each determination bybalancing Vthe voltage ofua Weston standard cellV l-.0l9-volts)''SC with the voltage drop across the Ris-Rra network by adjusting '6 rheostat control Ri. The batterygB producedflf.5fvlts and maycomprise two;` LittlefSix dry cells connected in parallel.

For lead and cadmium tests, taps are taken on'` the R15-Ris network at 0.83, 0.59, and 0.32 volt.vByv means of switches 822,832 and S42, thesepotentialsmay be applied successively across theelectrodes 33Y and35.

As a potential, of 0.83 volt is applied to the electrodes bridged bya test solution 36 to which a` pilot ionhaszbeen added as described herein, \an electrical 4current ows through the cell viab the dropping mercury electrode 30.v and the mercury pool electrode 35,]thereby causing a proportional voltage dropy across 3000-ohmwire-wound` precision resistor R10 in., series with the ce1-l. This voltage` drop, proportional to lead and Vrcadmium lions and` the` residual cell currentfluctuates in aregular manner be cause of the formation of mercuryrdropsfaty the -tipV ofA the capillary 33, and is measured by adjusting theslider of R5. The current` through the` Rv-R9= networkis adjfusted to be. proportional toonly the: cadmium ionsrby the positions of the sliders` on the potentiometer controls R3` and R4.

To make the adjustments5, switch S2142zis closed thereby applying 0.83 Volt to the dropping mercury electrode 30 The. average. voltage across the precision resistor R10 is balanced byadjlusting the slider of potenti-V ometer R5 so that the galvanom'eter G,.connected in the: circuit `by switchSi-S12,swings equally to each side of zero, which is considered to-,be the null condition. When push button switch S3r-S32 is depressed, applying 0.5.9 volt, the average voltageacross the3000-ohm resistor Rio` due now tothe residual cell current plusA only lead ion diifusion currents, is balanced with. thel voltage,v dropacross resistor R9 lby adjusting the potentiometer R3. Thus, the current through the Rr-Rg network becomes: proportional to the cadmium ion diiusion current as; the potential drop across the calibratedresistor Reis made equal to the potential drop across R10. due to the cadmiumv ion diliusion curr,ent. The resulting current'through R9 is the same current as thatthrough. the total R'r-Rg net work.

By closing switches S41-S-S4aand applying- 0.32 volt, the voltage drop across resistor Rio, is due to the residual current only. This voltageiis balanceduby adjusting the v slider of calibrated scale of,potentiometervRaand' thef resultant positionY of the slider indicates the amount` of` lead in the test solution.- The position of the sliderV on Rs, determined by bringing1 theggalvanometer G to null,V also determines the settingof the linked dial which carries scale 20. Thus, after. balancingl the galvanometer G with Rs the tetraethyllead per gallon of gasoline, equivalent to the l'ead concentration. in the test solution, is read directly from the scale 20. y

The relationship between the. resistances; Rs and Rs. is adjusted as part of the originall instrument calibration. Following the iinal adjustment ina measurement, thefollowing mathematical ratios are equal:

Lead-ion 'diusion current Cadmium-ion diffusion current withv 0.02 microamp-per division andf havingan 1100 ohm.

coilJ resistance, and is connected' to the appropriatepoints;v

the different measurements Vand forthese various. funcf-A tionsl the resistances in the circuit indicatedin the sche.-

' matic diagram may be' metallized'resistors havin'gthe fol? lowing values:y R11, 0.27 megohm; R12,4v 20,000 ohms;`

R13, 20,000 ohms;y andR1r4,`39,00,0f ohms., Switches4 S6, S7, and SS are of'the tap-switch type and serve to close the galvanometer circuits only momentarily while instruthe current from battery B with the ohm wire-wound 75 mental adjustments are being made.

The resistorsRir, R12, R13

The transformer T, adapted for 60 cycle A. C. and transforming from 115 volts to 6 volts, supplies current for the galvanometer scale lamp 55 and dial lamp 56 illuminating the -5 milliliter tetraethyl lead per gallon range scale on the scale 20.

Calibration of our device is carried out by means of a standard solution and the instrument may, for example, be calibrated at points corresponding to 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 ml. of tetraethyllead per gallon of gasoline. The standard lead solution consists of 1.875 grams of CP lead chloride dissolved in distilled water and diluted to 1000 m1. 10 ml. of the solution are equivalent to the lead contained inv 50 ml, of gasoline having one nil. of tetraethyllead per gallon. A portion of the solution equivalent to the desired concentration of tetraethyllead per gallon is admixed with 25 ml. of concentrated hydrochloric acid, 5.0 ml. of pilot ion solution, and rnl. of maxima suppressor. The pilot ion solution may, for example, consist of about 5.026 grams C. P. cadmium chloride (2.5 H2O) in 1000 ml. distilled water. The maxima suppressor solution may consist of about one gram of methylene blue dissolved in 1000 ml. of distilled water. The hydrochloric acid used has a specific gravity of 1.8-1.9.

The mixture is diluted to 250 ml. and a portion of the solution, e. g. l0-l5 ml. of final solution, is placed in the cell chamber 34 for making the polarographic measurement. Oxygen is purged from the test solution with nitrogen. After the electrical leads 51 and 52 are connected to the measuring cell electrodes, power is supplied to the instrument, switch S5 is turned to the on position, and the galvanometer G is checked for zero. A fixed pattern of operations, involving the successive impression of the three voltages, is followed in each case by adjustment of the associated potentiometers to produce an average zero on the galvanometer G. Following the iinal adjustment, the dial scale 20, controlled by the slider on the potentiometer Rs, is marked for the equivalent concentrationof tetraethyllead per gallon. This procedure is followed in establishing each of the selected calibration points, the points on the scale between the calibrated points being obtained by interpolation.

In making an analysis of a leaded gasoline, the tetraethyllead in a sample of gasoline equivalent to 50 ml. at 60"l F. is decomposed with hydrochloric acid and extracted in accordance with method D S26-48T described in A. S. T. M. Standards on Petroleum Products and Lubricants, pages 293-295 (1948). To measure the gasoline sample, a pipette is used to deliver the equivalent of 50 ml. of gasoline `at 60 F. for actual temperatures differing from 60 F., the stem of the pipette carrying aV special scale graduated from 15.6 to 35 C. 5 ml.,of the standard cadmium pilot ion solution and 5 ml. of maxima suppressor solution are introduced into the combined acid and aqueous extract contained in a 250 ml. graduated glass stoppered cylinder.

Distilled Water is added to the cylinder to make a total solution of about 250 ml. which is thoroughly mixed. to 15 ml. of this final solution are transferred to the measuring cell above the mercury pool therein. Oxygen is purged from the solution by bubbling oxygen-free nitrogen through the solution. The series of progressively decreasing potentials is then applied `across the electrodes Y result of ml. of tetraethyllead per gallon of the gasoline.

The invention has been described with reference to apparatus specifically designed for the determination of lead in gasoline and a system has been provided wherein successive decreasing potentials are applied. This feature permits the use of our unique apparatus for the direct 5 reading of metal ion concentration. It is also contemplated that the system can be modified for use in the analysis of several metals using a single pilot ion. For example, a double-scaled dial, one scale for lead and one for antimony can be provided and cadmium used as a 10 pilot ion for the determination of antimony in the presence of lead.

As described above, the device may be calibrated upon the establishment of the lead ion-cadmium ion ratios for various concentrations of lead. After once establishing 1) a single ratio for a given lead concentration and (2) a total scale based upon ratios for the desired spread in lead concentration with fixed pilot ion (cadmium) concentration, it is possible to make use of electrical adjustments in initially calibrating subsequent apparatus and thereby eliminating the actual measurement of solutions (as described above) for subsequent instrument calibrations.

This application is a continuation-in-part of our copending application S. N. 229,208, filed May 31, 1952,

for a Metal Ion Determination By Direct Reading System.

From the above it will be apparent that we have attained objects of our invention and although it has been described with reference to specific embodiments, it should be understood that this is by way of illustration only, and that our invention is not limited thereto. Furthermore, in view of the description given, modiiications will become apparent to those skilled in the art and such modifications and alternatives come within the scope of the invention described herein.

What we claim is:

In the method of polarographic analysis of aqueous solutions containing lead ions, the improvement which comprises segregating a measured quantity of such solution, adding a known proportion of cadimum ions to the aqueous solution under test, maintaining said solution of mixed ions between a dropping mercury electrode and a' submerged electrode, applying in series a rst potential of about 0.82'to 0.90 volt, a second potential of about 0.57 to 0.60 volt, and a third potential of about 0.30 to 0.37 volt, progressively stepwise across said electrodes, measuring the current ilowing between said electrodes and in Vthe associated electrical circuit when applying said potentials and balancing the said circuit for each of said applications of potentials, whereby the balancing step for the application of said first potential establishes a reference potential proportional to the sum of the residual current and diffusion currents due to lead and cadmium, the balancing step for the application of said second potential cancels the effect of the diffusion current due to cadmium, and the balancing step for the application of said third potential cancels the elect of the residual current'and provides a direct reading of the concentration of said lead ions in the solution.

References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS Smith et al. Sept. 18, 1928 Parker May 27, 1930 oTHi-:R RFERENCl-:s

The Oil & Gas Journal, Sept. 26, 1940, pp. 51 and- Coleman Mar. 14, 1944 

